May 18, 2025

Web and Technology News

Magic Leap 2 is the best AR headset yet, but will an enterprise focus save the company?

Magic Leap’s glasses were supposed to lead us into the augmented reality era, a world beyond screens where we could interact with digital objects as if they were standing right next to us. Too bad they failed spectacularly. By early 2020, the company h…

iPadOS 16 and macOS Ventura arrive on October 24th

You’ll finally be able to get your hands on iPadOS 16 next Monday, October 24th, Apple announced this morning. The new OS includes support for Apple’s Stage Manager multi-tasking feature, which should make it easier to move between multiple apps on your iPad. That feature is also headed to macOS Ventura, which launches on the same day. iPadOS 16 is landing alongside Apple’s new iPad Pro, equipped with an M2 chip and Wi-Fi 6E, and will also later arrive on the revamped (and more expensive) standard iPad. You’ll need a fifth-gen iPad or iPad Mini, any iPad Pro, or a third-gen iPad Air to install the new OS.

In our preview of iPadOS 16, we found that Apple is doing a better job of marrying it’s excellent hardware with better software. It’s no wonder the new iPad also has a redesigned Magic Keyboard Folio—iPad OS 16 will make Apple’s tablet a far better laptop replacement for some users. As for macOS Ventura, it’s a more significant update than last year’s OS, though Stage Manager will likely be a controversial feature for some users. Personally, I found it better than moving between icons on the macOS dock, and I appreciated that it was easy to turn Stage Manager on and off as necessary.

Twitter is testing a way for users to limit their mentions

One of the great things about Twitter is that you can reach out to any public user with a quick @ mention to their username. One of the worst things about Twitter is that it’s all too easy to abuse that feature. But it turns out, the bird network may be working on a way to control those mentions. According to privacy researcher and engineer Jane Manchun Wong, the company is testing out the ability to block @ mentions entirely, or limit them to people who already follow you. (Literally, don’t @ me, bro.)

Twitter privacy designer Dominic Camozzi initially confirmed the feature was in the works, but as The Verge reports, he later deleted that confirmation. Giving users more granular control of @ mentions falls right in line with Twitter’s other recent privacy features, like limiting replies, and being able to unmention yourself from threads. While it might make Twitter seem less open, but mention controls will ultimately make the service a better experience for users who inevitably find themselves targeted by trolls.

Microsoft Surface Studio 2+ hands-on: More power, but still not enough

Based on its initial specs, the Surface Studio 2+ wasn’t the upgrade we’ve been waiting four years to see. Perhaps spending a bit of time with it will change my mind. Maybe I’d be fine with an 11th-gen Intel CPU, instead of this year’s (far better) 12th-gen chips. During Microsoft’s hands-on event at its NYC store (or “Experience Center,” as the company prefers), I spent some time with the Surface Studio 2+. It’s certainly a very fast computer — but the thing is, it should be much more.

Microsoft hasn’t touched the Studio 2+’s design at all: It still has a 28-inch PixelSense screen that’s easily converted into an easel-like view. The company was eager to throw in much faster hardware for this revision, according to Microsoft’s Ishmael Adams, a senior designer on the Surface team. Unfortunately, he says, Intel’s latest chips weren’t ready when the company started revamping the Studio 2+. That’s a shame, since we’ve found the 12th-gen chips to be faster and more power efficient. But hey, at least there’s an RTX 3060 GPU now, and there’s also potential to plug in an external GPU via a Thunderbolt 4 connection.

Surface Studio 2+
Devindra Hardawar/Engadget

For the past several years, the Studio 2 has become an increasingly terrible computer to buy, due to its 2017-era hardware and sky-high price. So at the very least, it’s nice to see a new model with better internals. The Studio 2+ is fast enough to last most creatives for several years. But if it had a 12th-gen Intel chip, it would be even more future proof. For a computer that starts at $4,300, I don’t think that’s too much to ask.

Beyond the internals, though, the Studio 2+ is still a striking all-in-one PC. We’ve seen some AiO competitors from Dell and HP, but nobody has pushed this hard to make a truly unique desktop experience. Perhaps one day Microsoft will be able to deliver a cheaper Studio device, much like it did with the Studio Laptop.

Follow along with the rest of our news from Microsoft’s 2022 Surface event.

Microsoft Surface Pro 9 hands-on: Can Intel and ARM models live in harmony?

On the one hand, the Surface Pro 9 is pretty much what we expected: a jump up to Intel’s 12th-gen CPUs. But Microsoft surprised us with a huge shakeup for its tablet PCs. There’s also a Surface Pro 9 running a custom SQ3 ARM chip, which also includes built-in 5G. Can an x86 Intel processor and a mobile ARM chip really sit side by side? We got a chance to compare the two new machines at Microsoft’s hands-on event, and to be honest, we just have more questions.

Both models look and feel the same, save for the more visible 5G antennas on the Arm model. Microsoft representatives say performance is also comparable between the SQ3 and Intel’s chips, something we’ll have to fully test to believe. (An early Geekbench 5 test on a demo unit hit 978/4,760, which is far slower than Intel 11th and 12th-gen systems we’ve reviewed. Those figures could improve with better software and firmware, though.) The same reps also noted that app compatibility with legacy x86 apps has gotten better for ARM devices, and there are an increasing number of native Windows apps which will run just fine across both platforms.

In either case, you’re getting tablet PCs that can easily transform into functional laptops with their keyboard cases. Unfortunately, those are still sold separately, as is the Slim Pen 2 Microsoft introduced last year. The Surface Pro 9 won’t change your mind about the viability of using a tablet as a PC, but on the Intel side it’s nice to see a major speed bump.

The SQ3 Arm model also has a few features the Intel version doesn’t, thanks to its neural processor. That includes some real-time enhancements to video chats, like blurring your background. (The video quality across both systems also look fantastic.) According to Microsoft, it’s possible to bring those features to Intel chips when they have their own neural chips, but unfortunately those aren’t available on Intel’s current lineup.

Surface Pro 9
Devindra Hardawar/Engadget

Microsoft representatives admitted there may be some confusion among some shoppers, since they can easily walk out of a store with two very different computers. But it sounds like the company is willing to deal with those usability bumps, rather than splitting the Surface Pro line once again. 

Follow along with the rest of our news from Microsoft’s 2022 Surface event.

Microsoft’s Surface Studio 2+ gets 11th-gen Intel chips and RTX 3060 graphics

It’s been four years since we got the Surface Studio 2, the much-improved followup to Microsoft’s ever-so-flexible all-in-one desktop. Surely, the company has something special in store for the next version, right? Well, yes and no. The Surface Studio 2+ is indeed significantly faster than before, thanks to Intel’s H35 11th-gen CPU and NVIDIA’s RTX 3060 graphics.

But we’ve also spent most of this year being impressed by Intel’s terrific 12th-gen hybrid chips, which deliver vastly better performance than 11th-gen CPUs. (Just imagine how much more intriguing the Studio 2+ would be with a 16-core 12th-gen HX CPU.) You’d think a computer starting at $4,300 would have the fastest hardware available? No wonder it’s not called the Surface Studio 3.

Surface Studio 2+
Microsoft

If you’ve been following our coverage of the Studio line, the Studio 2+ will sound pretty familiar. It has the same 28-inch PixelSense screen, a flexible hinge that can be effortlessly pushed down to an easel-like angle, and it packs in all of its hardware in a desktop-friendly base. Following the trend we’ve seen with all of Microsoft’s Surface hardware this year, there aren’t any exterior design changes at all. But hey, at least we’ve finally got Thunderbolt 4 USB-C ports and Dolby Vision HDR.

Microsoft claims the Core i7-11370H CPU in the Surface Studio 2+ is 50 percent faster than the Studio 2, as well as five times faster than the original 2017 modeled. Coupled with the RTX 3060, which is twice as fast as the GTX 1060 in the Studio 2, this new desktop will definitely be a fast performer. But the hardware geek in me can’t help but wonder why Microsoft couldn’t make Intel’s 12th-gen chips work. They’re technically more efficient, and it’s not as if there wasn’t enough time to prepare for new hardware.

Surface Studio 2+
Microsoft

I’m sure the Studio 2+ will satisfy general buyers who are willing to pony up big bucks for a uniquely flexible desktop. But I can’t think of recommending Intel’s 11th-gen chips in any other computer today, unless you’re snagging it with a serious discount. For such a premium, they’re practically a dealbreaker.

At least the Studio 2+ is well equipped otherwise, shipping with 32GB of DDR4 RAM and a 1TB SSD. (It sure would be nice to see some SSD expansion slots, though). But take note, if you want it to ship with Microsoft’s Surface Pen, Keyboard and Mouse, you’ll have to spend an extra $300. (That makes it a $4,500 computer with last year’s Intel chip! The horror!)

You can pre-order the Surface Studio 2+ today, and it’ll be available in select markets on October 25th.

Follow along with the rest of our news from Microsoft’s 2022 Surface event.

The Surface Pro 9 comes with either 12th-gen Intel CPUs or a 5G Arm chip

Last year’s Surface Pro 8 was one of the biggest design upgrades for Microsoft’s tablet PC, adding long-awaited features like Thunderbolt 4 and surprising upgrades like a 120Hz display. This year’s Surface Pro 9, paradoxically, is both more of the same and a dramatic departure. It has the usual chip refresh — in this case, Intel’s far superior 12th-gen CPUs — but there’s also a new 5G-equipped model with a custom SQ 3 Arm chip.

If that sounds confusing to you, well, it is. We last saw the company’s SQ chip in the 2020 Surface Pro X, a computer that we found both beautiful and frustrating, thanks to Windows’ crummy software compatibility with Arm chips. To shift that problem over to a computer with the same name as its Intel sibling is a recipe for disaster. (We can just imagine the frustrated Best Buy shoppers who are dazzled with the idea of a 5G Surface, only to learn they can’t run most of their traditional Windows apps.) The 5G Pro 9 is also broken down into millimeter-wave and Sub-6 variants, which will be sold in their respective markets.

Surface Pro 9
Microsoft

It’s understandable why Microsoft isn’t keen to keep the Surface Pro X moniker going — the Pro 8 lifted many of its modern design cues, after all. But from what we’ve seen, Windows 11 doesn’t solve the problems we initially had with the Pro X.

Beyond the chip updates, the Pro 9 looks mostly the same as its predecessor, with a 13″ 120Hz PixelSense display, as well as relatively slim screen bezels. Microsoft claims the 1080p webcam has been improved, and there’s also a 4-degree tilt to help keep you centered. You’ve also got a few bolder colors to choose from, including Sapphire, Forest and a new Liberty London Special Edition. (And yes, before you ask, you’ll still have to pick up a Surface Keyboard and Slim Pen 2 separately if you actually want to be productive with the Pro 9.)

Surface Pro 9
Microsoft

Adding to the confusion of having two chip platforms under the same product name, there are several major differences between them. For example, the Intel version can be equipped with up to 32GB of LPDDR5 RAM and a 1TB SSD, while the Arm variant is limited to 16GB of LPDDR4x RAM and a 512GB SSD at most. You’ll also lose the two USB-C 4.0/Thunderbolt 4 ports on the Arm Pro 9 — instead, you’ll get two USB-C 3.2 connections. (On the plus side, the 5G model should get up to 19 hours of battery life, 3.5 more hours than the Intel version.)

The Intel-based Surface Pro 9 starts at $999 for a Core i5 model with 8GB of RAM and a paltry 128GB of storage, while the cheapest 5G model will run you $1,300 with the same specs. You’ll be able to pre-order the Surface Pro 12 in select models starting today, with general availability beginning on October 25th.

Follow along with the rest of our news from Microsoft’s 2022 Surface event.

Microsoft Surface 2022 event liveblog: Surface Pro 9, Surface Laptop 5, Surface Studio 2+ and more

Techtober isn’t over yet! Today, we’re gearing up to cover Microsoft’s Surface device event at its NYC store. Senior Editors Sam Rutherford and Devindra Hardawar will be watching the stream and jotting all of their thoughts down in this live blog. And once the stream is over, they’ll be on the ground to churn out some hands-on coverage of these new Surface devices. Stay tuned for some deeply nerdy (and hopefully fun!) Surface commentary.

Follow along with the rest of our news from Microsoft’s 2022 Surface event.

NVIDIA RTX 4090 review: Unholy power

How do you go about reviewing something like NVIDIA’s RTX 4090? Just looking at its specs alone, it’s obviously the fastest consumer GPU we’ve ever seen. So sure, I can tell you that I can play just about anything in 4K with ray tracing and every graphical nicety turned on. Hell, it can even scale up to 8K if you’re a masochist. For a $1,599 video card, it damn well better. But the real question is, who is this thing actually for?

Benching the RTX 4090 against NVIDIA and AMD’s older hardware is practically pointless. Of course it’s far faster. Of course it’ll make you jealous. If you’ve got the cash and you’re itching to upgrade, go with God (or NVIDIA’s leather-clad CEO Jensen Huang, as the company’s fans see him). But for anyone else who doesn’t need bleeding edge hardware, it exists purely as an object of lust. Sure, you could wait for the upcoming RTX 4080 cards, or whatever AMD has in the works, but it’s not a 4090. Just like the last generation of GPUs, NVIDIA is throwing down the gauntlet with a power-hungry card for the most hardcore gamers and creators.

If your mind isn’t made up, I assume you’re here just to see how much of a beast the 4090 is. And let me tell you, it’s a stunning thing to behold. Weighing in at 4.8 pounds, and approaching the size of the PlayStation 5, the RTX 4090 is a triple-slot GPU that will dominate whatever case it’s in. Seriously, if you’re thinking of getting it, be sure to measure your PC to ensure you can fit a nearly foot-long card that’s close to 5 inches thick.

NVIDIA RTX 4090
Devindra Hardawar/Engadget

Be prepared to upgrade your power supply too: The 4090 has a high 450W TDP (the same thermal design profile as the 3090 Ti) and it requires an 850W PSU. (Some third-party companies are pushing that demand to 1200W PSUs!) While it can be powered by a single PCIe 5.0 cable, there still aren’t many of those PSUs on the market, so most people will likely end up using four 8-pin adapters. I cursed Jensen’s name when I realized I needed to string another PSU line, after tidying up all of my cables.

Beyond its obscene power demands, though, NVIDIA hasn’t changed much about the 4090 Founder Edition’s design from its previous model: It’s still a high-end, all-metal card with a massive vapor chamber, heatsink array and two fans on opposite sides. NVIDIA claims they can push 20 percent more air than the 3090 Ti – in my testing, that meant the 4090 stayed at a relatively cool 70C under load.

What’s truly special about the RTX 4090, though, is everything under the hood. It features the company’s new “Ada Lovelace” architecture (named after the world’s first computer programmer, though I wonder if NVIDIA pays any royalties to turn her name into marketing). It has 16,384 CUDA cores (almost 6,000 more than the 3090 Ti), a base clock speed of 2.23GHz (boost to 2.52GHz), and 24GB of GDDR6X RAM. With figures like these, the upcoming RTX 4080 cards (which start with 7,680 CUDA cores) seem puny in comparison.

NVIDIA RTX 4090

And really, that seems like the point of dropping the 4090 before the rest of NVIDIA’s new GPUs. It’s like a heavenly body so massive it warps space time around it. This is the new standard. What other GPU can get you 135fps in Cyberpunk 2049 while playing in 4K with maxed out graphics and ray tracing? 

To be clear, though, the 4090 isn’t just about brute-force power. It was able to reach that killer Cyberpunk framerate by using DLSS 3, NVIDIA’s latest AI upscaling technology that can now generate entire frames of imagery on its own. (That’s in addition to upscaling lower resolution textures using AI, like earlier versions.) DLSS 3 helped A Plague Tale Requiem perform more than twice as fast while running in 4K, delivering around 175fps (up from 74fps).

None

3DMark TimeSpy Extreme

Port Royal (Ray Tracing)

Control

Blender

NVIDIA RTX 3090

16,464

25,405/117.62 fps

4K (Native) High RT: 107 fps

12,335

NVIDIA RTX 3080 Ti

8,683

12,948/59.95fps

4K (Native) 43fps Med RT

5,940

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

7,713

9,104/42.15fps

4K (Native) No RT 28-40

N/A

The RTX 4090 had no trouble delivering 107 fps in Control while playing in 4K with high ray tracing settings. But you know what’s even better? Getting a solid 128 fps when I flipped on an older version of DLSS. It’s just unfortunate it doesn’t support DLSS 3 yet, because I’m sure it would eke out even better performance. Even though the game was actually being rendered in 1,440p, to my eye, DLSS still does a stunning job of making that seem like 4K. (I tested the 4090 alongside Samsung’s 55-inch Arc monitor, giving me a much larger view than my typical 34-inch ultrawide screen. If there were graphical anomalies, I would have seen them.) 

I was particularly interested in stressing ray tracing performance on the 4090, because that was a feature that still managed to bring NVIDIA’s 30-series cards to their knees. It enables more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections. For most, I’d wager the graphical facelift it delivers would be more impressive than a skyrocketing framerate count. So it’s a wonder to see an NVIDIA card that can finally deliver 4K and solid ray tracing beyond 100fps. Is that worth $1,599, though? That remains unclear, especially since we don’t know how the rest of the 40-series cards will compete.

NVIDIA RTX 4090
Devindra Hardawar/Engadget

If you’re looking for a video card that can do more than just game, the 4090 may make more sense. In the Blender 3D rendering benchmark, it scored twice as high as the RTX 3090 Ti, a GPU released earlier this year for an eye-watering $1,999. (Let’s have a moment of silence for the poor souls who jumped on that card.) When it came to transcoding a short 4K clip into 1080p, the RTX 4090 was also 10 seconds faster than the 3080 Ti. That could certainly add up if you’re rendering longer clips, episodes or feature films.

It’s hard not to covet the RTX 4090, especially once you see what it’s capable of. It’s a glimpse into a world where we can finally get uncompromised ray tracing. But with the $899 and $1,199 RTX 4080 cards on the horizon, it’s tough to drop the price of an entire computer just to get the best frame rates in town There’s just so much more to consider these days. You could pair up one of those 4080s with a Steam Deck, for example, and bring the joys of PC gaming on the road and all over your home. Sure, you won’t have the prestige of being in the 4090 club, but you’ll probably end up having more fun.

NVIDIA RTX 4090 review: Unholy power

How do you go about reviewing something like NVIDIA’s RTX 4090? Just looking at its specs alone, it’s obviously the fastest consumer GPU we’ve ever seen. So sure, I can tell you that I can play just about anything in 4K with ray tracing and every graphical nicety turned on. Hell, it can even scale up to 8K if you’re a masochist. For a $1,599 video card, it damn well better. But the real question is, who is this thing actually for?

Benching the RTX 4090 against NVIDIA and AMD’s older hardware is practically pointless. Of course it’s far faster. Of course it’ll make you jealous. If you’ve got the cash and you’re itching to upgrade, go with God (or NVIDIA’s leather-clad CEO Jensen Huang, as the company’s fans see him). But for anyone else who doesn’t need bleeding edge hardware, it exists purely as an object of lust. Sure, you could wait for the upcoming RTX 4080 cards, or whatever AMD has in the works, but it’s not a 4090. Just like the last generation of GPUs, NVIDIA is throwing down the gauntlet with a power-hungry card for the most hardcore gamers and creators.

If your mind isn’t made up, I assume you’re here just to see how much of a beast the 4090 is. And let me tell you, it’s a stunning thing to behold. Weighing in at 4.8 pounds, and approaching the size of the PlayStation 5, the RTX 4090 is a triple-slot GPU that will dominate whatever case it’s in. Seriously, if you’re thinking of getting it, be sure to measure your PC to ensure you can fit a nearly foot-long card that’s close to 5 inches thick.

NVIDIA RTX 4090
Devindra Hardawar/Engadget

Be prepared to upgrade your power supply too: The 4090 has a high 450W TDP (the same thermal design profile as the 3090 Ti) and it requires an 850W PSU. (Some third-party companies are pushing that demand to 1200W PSUs!) While it can be powered by a single PCIe 5.0 cable, there still aren’t many of those PSUs on the market, so most people will likely end up using four 8-pin adapters. I cursed Jensen’s name when I realized I needed to string another PSU line, after tidying up all of my cables.

Beyond its obscene power demands, though, NVIDIA hasn’t changed much about the 4090 Founder Edition’s design from its previous model: It’s still a high-end, all-metal card with a massive vapor chamber, heatsink array and two fans on opposite sides. NVIDIA claims they can push 20 percent more air than the 3090 Ti – in my testing, that meant the 4090 stayed at a relatively cool 70C under load.

What’s truly special about the RTX 4090, though, is everything under the hood. It features the company’s new “Ada Lovelace” architecture (named after the world’s first computer programmer, though I wonder if NVIDIA pays any royalties to turn her name into marketing). It has 16,384 CUDA cores (almost 6,000 more than the 3090 Ti), a base clock speed of 2.23GHz (boost to 2.52GHz), and 24GB of GDDR6X RAM. With figures like these, the upcoming RTX 4080 cards (which start with 7,680 CUDA cores) seem puny in comparison.

NVIDIA RTX 4090

And really, that seems like the point of dropping the 4090 before the rest of NVIDIA’s new GPUs. It’s like a heavenly body so massive it warps space time around it. This is the new standard. What other GPU can get you 135fps in Cyberpunk 2049 while playing in 4K with maxed out graphics and ray tracing? 

To be clear, though, the 4090 isn’t just about brute-force power. It was able to reach that killer Cyberpunk framerate by using DLSS 3, NVIDIA’s latest AI upscaling technology that can now generate entire frames of imagery on its own. (That’s in addition to upscaling lower resolution textures using AI, like earlier versions.) DLSS 3 helped A Plague Tale Requiem perform more than twice as fast while running in 4K, delivering around 175fps (up from 74fps).

None

3DMark TimeSpy Extreme

Port Royal (Ray Tracing)

Control

Blender

NVIDIA RTX 3090

16,464

25,405/117.62 fps

4K (Native) High RT: 107 fps

12,335

NVIDIA RTX 3080 Ti

8,683

12,948/59.95fps

4K (Native) 43fps Med RT

5,940

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

7,713

9,104/42.15fps

4K (Native) No RT 28-40

N/A

The RTX 4090 had no trouble delivering 107 fps in Control while playing in 4K with high ray tracing settings. But you know what’s even better? Getting a solid 128 fps when I flipped on an older version of DLSS. It’s just unfortunate it doesn’t support DLSS 3 yet, because I’m sure it would eke out even better performance. Even though the game was actually being rendered in 1,440p, to my eye, DLSS still does a stunning job of making that seem like 4K. (I tested the 4090 alongside Samsung’s 55-inch Arc monitor, giving me a much larger view than my typical 34-inch ultrawide screen. If there were graphical anomalies, I would have seen them.) 

I was particularly interested in stressing ray tracing performance on the 4090, because that was a feature that still managed to bring NVIDIA’s 30-series cards to their knees. It enables more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections. For most, I’d wager the graphical facelift it delivers would be more impressive than a skyrocketing framerate count. So it’s a wonder to see an NVIDIA card that can finally deliver 4K and solid ray tracing beyond 100fps. Is that worth $1,599, though? That remains unclear, especially since we don’t know how the rest of the 40-series cards will compete.

NVIDIA RTX 4090
Devindra Hardawar/Engadget

If you’re looking for a video card that can do more than just game, the 4090 may make more sense. In the Blender 3D rendering benchmark, it scored twice as high as the RTX 3090 Ti, a GPU released earlier this year for an eye-watering $1,999. (Let’s have a moment of silence for the poor souls who jumped on that card.) When it came to transcoding a short 4K clip into 1080p, the RTX 4090 was also 10 seconds faster than the 3080 Ti. That could certainly add up if you’re rendering longer clips, episodes or feature films.

It’s hard not to covet the RTX 4090, especially once you see what it’s capable of. It’s a glimpse into a world where we can finally get uncompromised ray tracing. But with the $899 and $1,199 RTX 4080 cards on the horizon, it’s tough to drop the price of an entire computer just to get the best frame rates in town There’s just so much more to consider these days. You could pair up one of those 4080s with a Steam Deck, for example, and bring the joys of PC gaming on the road and all over your home. Sure, you won’t have the prestige of being in the 4090 club, but you’ll probably end up having more fun.

Engadget Podcast: The Pixel 7 and Google’s new family of devices

This week, Cherlynn, Devindra and Engadget’s Sam Rutherford dive into everything we learned at Google’s Pixel 7 event. Sure, it’s nice to have new phones, but it’s even nicer to see Google developing a cohesive design for all of its new devices. The Pixel Watch actually looks cool! And while we were ready to knock the (way too late) Pixel Tablet, its speaker base seems genuinely useful. Google may have finally figured out how to combine its software and AI smarts with well-designed hardware.

Listen above, or subscribe on your podcast app of choice. If you’ve got suggestions or topics you’d like covered on the show, be sure to email us or drop a note in the comments! And be sure to check out our other podcasts, the Morning After and Engadget News!

Subscribe!

Topics

  • Pixel 7 and Pixel 7 Pro first thoughts – 12:04

  • Pixel Watch – 18:00

  • Also announced, Google Nest updates – 37:11

  • Intel Arc A750 and A770 graphics cards review – 42:27

  • Elon Musk announces intent to buy Twitter (again) – 44:56

  • Tesla showed off its robot (sort of) – 46:32

  • Gatorade made a smart water bottle – 47:40 

  • iPhone 14 Plus review – 49:42

  • Pop culture picks – 52:41

Livestream

Credits
Hosts: Cherlynn Low and Devindra Hardawar
Guest: Sam Rutherford
Producer: Ben Ellman
Music: Dale North and Terrence O’Brien
Livestream producers: Julio Barrientos
Graphic artists: Luke Brooks and Brian Oh